MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
MASSILLON CITY COUNCIL
HELD, MONDAY, MAY 3, 2010

 

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER B I=d like to welcome all of you to Massillon City Council for Monday, May 3, 2010.  We have in attendance with us this evening: Mayor Frank Cicchinelli, Auditor Jayne Ferrero, Engineer Keith Dylewski, Law Director Perry Stergios and Community Development & Planning Director Aane Aaby.  On the wall to your left are agendas for anyone who wishes to follow the meeting.  Also under item #5 on the agenda is where the public can speak on any item that appears on the agenda and then under item #17 is where the public can speak on any item that does not appear on the agenda.  I=d also like to remind anyone with a cell phone please turn it off or turn it very far down. 

1.  ROLL CALL

Roll call for the evening found the following Council Members present:  Gary Anderson, Kathy Catazaro-Perry, Dave Hersher, Ron Mang, Paul Manson, Dave McCune, Donnie Peters and Larry Slagle.

Thus giving a roll call vote of 8 present.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Mr. Mang, we need a motion for Mr. Townsend. 

COUNCILMAN MANG B I move to excuse Councilmen Townsend, seconded by Councilwoman Catazaro-Perry.

Roll call vote of 6 yes, 2 no, to excuse Councilman Townsend.  Manson and Peters voted no.

2. INVOCATION

COUNCILMAN MANG  B Gave the invocation for tonight.  

3.  PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

COUNCILMAN MANG – Chairman of the Community Development Committee led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance.  

4.  READING OF THE JOURNAL

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Madame Clerk, are the minutes of the previous meeting transcribed and open for public viewing (Yes, they are)  Are there any additions or corrections to the minutes?  If not the minutes stand approved as written.

5.  REMARKS OF DELEGATIONS AND CITIZENS TO MATTERS ON THE AGENDA

6.  INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Mr. Mang?

COUNCILMAN MANG B I would like to amend the agenda I’d like to bring Ordinance No. 47 – 2010 forward as the first item on the agenda. 

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Is there any objection to bringing Ordinance No. 47 – 2010 forward as our first item. 

ORDINANCE NO. 47 B 2010                     BY:   COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Amending Section 1151.02 of the Massillon Code of 1985 rezoning a certain tract of land from Tuscarawas Township (No Zoning) to R-1 Single Family Residential.

 

COUNCILMAN MANG B Yes, a public hearing was held this evening.  Mr. Hendricks did speak on behalf of I guess his son and encouraged us to vote his property to R-1 single family.  So that would be the recommendation for the chairman of the committee.  I would not unless there’s questions I would like to bring it forward for its passage.

COUNCILMAN MANG moved to bring Ordinance No. 47 – 2010 forward for passage, seconded by Councilman Hersher. 

ORDINANCE NO. 47 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 8 YES.

ORDINANCE NO. 58 B 2010                     BY:   COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Authorizing the Mayor of the City of Massillon, Ohio, to enter into an agreement with Margaritas Mexican Grill to provide an economic development “inducement grant” to assist the company in locating its restaurant in Massillon, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN MANG B Yes, the Margaritas Grill the Mayor has proposed and I agree with him that we should have a loan so to speak to the gentleman who wishes to start a Mexican outlet for food in the City of Massillon.  This economic development is quite open to anybody or any new business who would like to participate.  This gentleman asked and he was here at our work session so if there’s no questions I think the gentleman could probably use the money to get started.  I would be asking for suspension of the rules. 

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Do we have any questions?  I will mention this is a grant, Mr. Mang, not a loan. 

COUNCILMAN MANG B Yes, it’s a grant.

COUNCILMAN MANG moved for suspension of the rules and passage, seconded by Councilman McCune.

The rules were suspended by a roll call vote of 8 yes.

ORDINANCE NO. 58 – 2010 WAS GIVEN FIRST READING.

ORDINANCE NO. 59 B 2010                     BY:   COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Repealing amended Ordinance No. 54 – 2010 in its entirety, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN MANG B Yes, I’m going to ask Mr. Stergios if he would come forward and we can talk about Ordinance No. 59 and 60 because what we talked about in the work session is a little bit different here this evening.  Mr. Stergios?

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – The intent of 59 and 60 is to correctly set forth the services that will be provided by the city with regard to the what we call the US 30/Richville Drive Annexation.  One of the things we have not ever done an expedited type II annexation.  The statute technically says within 20 days after we file the petition we are to pass the service ordinance.  I think most of you would remember that we were intending to pass these things at like two meetings ago and we only had six people here or something and they ended up getting crisscrossed on the agenda.  So in order to meet the technically requirements of the statute I decided it would be best to repeal the first one we did and then pass a new one which would be the second one of the agenda Ordinance No. 60.  Also I did add a couple additional things to Ordinance No. 60 that I think are required under the Ohio Revised Code to be included in the ordinance when you have an expedited type II annexation.  One is language which regard to zoning in the area if somehow it would be determined by council that this the uses of this property were incompatible with the neighbors property that are outside of the city limits that we would require buffer zones and zoning regulations to have some sort of a buffer zone incompatibility.  I really don’t think that would be an issue considering where this area is but the statute requires that I thought it was good to add that that’s section 3.  Then section 4 specifically says again I think we already said this once but I thought it was advisable to put it in that Massillon the City of Massillon consents to the proposed annexation and consents to the zoning language.  So other than that its basically identical there were some changes in the numbers of the statutes but nothing of consequence more what I thought legally we had to do. 

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Any questions for the law director?  Mrs. Catazaro-Perry?

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B I’m reading section 1 on 60 but I just want to be clear before I repeal this one and vote for 60 is says that we will maintain the full width sections of Nave, Richville Drive, Stump and Cincinnat.  Richville Drive goes all the way down to Navarre Road; are we doing that entire road?

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – We only have to maintain the full width where it is adjacent to the city.  So and I do have the map but its relatively short distance.  It wouldn’t go all the way down to the end it would really be right there to about where it goes underneath 30 or dead ends into Stump.  I think or help me Keith. 

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B It says the full width and Stump this is where I grew up so I know this area very well.  So Stump though Cincinnat comes off of Stump but Stump goes all the way down.  So where does it stop?

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – I can get the map in about 10 seconds.

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B Okay, I mean I would just like to see that because that’s a long distance.

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – We don’t have to go the whole distance just where it’s adjacent to the city’s corporation limits. 

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B There’s Nave Street as well that should probably be shown on the map because there’s two sections of Nave.  So it should be clarified because it goes across Genoa then. 

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – If we refer the annexation map that was filed we would have what is in gray is being annexed.  So the parts of Nave we would maintain right here Richville would be coming from the existing corporation lines down underneath Route 30 to where it looks like it hits Stump and then stop there.

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B Well, here’s Cincinnat though.

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – And then Cincinnat would just be again where it’s adjacent to the city to this point.  Only what’s in the gray area would we maintain the full width.

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B Would this be included in the legislation then?

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – Yes.

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B Okay, thank you.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B I would like to ask the engineer a question if I could Mr. Mang.  (Go ahead)  Mr. Dylewski, are there any streets or roads anywhere that the city is responsible for that are either not in the city or directly adjacent to the city as in this case?

ENGINEER DYLEWSKI – I’m not aware that we maintain anything that wouldn’t be in the corporation limits, no.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Thank you. Mr. Mang?

COUNCILMAN MANG moved for suspension of the rules and passage, seconded by Councilman Hersher.

The rules were suspended by a roll call vote of 8 yes.

ORDINANCE NO. 59 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 8 YES.

ORDINANCE NO. 60 B 2010                     BY:   COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Indicating what services and zoning conditions the City of Massillon, Ohio, will provide to the US 30 – Richville Drive Area Annexation, upon annexation, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN MANG B We’ve been given the reasons behind the appeal and the new piece of legislation if there’s no further questions I’m going to be asking for suspension of the rules.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Mrs. Catazaro-Perry?

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B I would like someone to explain section 3 in this ordinance. 

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Who would like to call forward? 

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B Mr. Stergios, looks like he’s coming our way; he would be fine. 

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – Section 3, is taken verbatim from the Ohio Revised Code that says when you file a type II expedited annexation petition that you have to include this language in the ordinance with regard to either services or a separate ordinance.  I chose to combine it in here and I will I guess it is somewhat confusing to read.  But I guess for example if we were going to zone that I-industrial it may not necessarily be compatible with the agricultural uses that surround the area so we would as council or as a city would require the owner of the annexed territory to provide for a buffer separating the use of the annexed territory and the adjacent land remaining in the township.  So it was clearly incompatible we would require them as a condition of their zoning permit to create a buffer zone.  I don’t know how else to say it and it’s mandated that we do that or include this language.  So it’s something we would have to do but right now I don’t know if anyone has any anticipation of what potential uses would be down there anyhow.  But it’s to protect the property that remains in the township and try to keep the uses compatible with what is outside the corporation limits. 

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B And do we have any responsibilities to create the buffer zone as well.

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – Well, once if this comes in we will have to give that property a zoning classification.  I don’t know if anyone has thought about what classification we’re going to give it or not at this point.  But maybe the Mayor or Aane what was that Mayor?  It will probably be industrial if we gave it an industrial classification then we would have to if somebody ever did an industrial development there they would have to create a buffer zone be it trees, embankments something to protect the neighboring property holders from annoyance.  Well, the school is far enough removed that it would really affect the school.  They’re talking more you know if someone has a house right beside this parcel then we will do something to try to buffer there or buffer it from the uses that are done. 

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B We would or Perry Township would?   

LAW DIRECTOR STERGIOS – We would.

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B So this is our so section 3 is our responsibility.  (Yeah)  Okay.   

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Thank you. Mr. Mang, I see the mayor would like to come forward. 

MAYOR CICCHINELLI – Just to make it clear the annexation consists of 100+ acres so the school property whatever the rule of thumb the law is whatever the area is zoned in the township the city has to rezone it once its annexed and official to whatever city zoning classification is close to what the township has it zoned.  In the future however zoning can be changed so but the school itself will remain residential.  So that entire school property which is the bulk of the area to be annexed shall remain residential.  The only part that could change in the future would be the easement near the bottom of the annexation along Cincinnat Drive.  But that’s long term but it has to be zoned whatever it’s zoned in the township and then the city can change it later on go through the same procedures as we do for any rezoning. 

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Any other questions for the Mayor?  Thank you. Mr. Mang?

COUNCILMAN MANG moved for suspension of the rules and passage, seconded by Councilman McCune.  

The rules were suspended by a roll call vote of 8 yes.

ORDINANCE NO. 60 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 8 YES.

ORDINANCE NO. 61 B 2010                     BY:   ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE

Authorizing the Director of Public Service and Safety of the City of Massillon, Ohio, to sign the grant agreement with the Ohio Department of Development to assist in the performance of a Phase II Environmental Assessment on the former Republic Steel Property, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN HERSHER B Sometime ago we authorized the application for this grant.  It’s been awarded and this is to sign the agreement to accept the grant amount of $300,000.  It is for the city working with PSR Development Limited to doing an environmental study at the old Republic site.  There’s no expense for the city in neither the grant nor the study.  There is a deadline to complete the study per the agreement.  So having no questions at all at the work session that I recall and none since I would like to pass this, this evening. 

COUNCILMAN HERSHER moved for suspension of the rules and passage, seconded by Councilman Slagle. 

The rules were suspended by a roll call vote of 8 yes.

ORDINANCE NO. 61 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 8 YES.

ORDINANCE NO. 62 B 2010                     BY:   STREETS, HIGHWAYS, TRAFFIC & SAFETY

Authorizing the Director of Public Service and Safety of the City of Massillon, Ohio, to advertise for and receive sealed bids and enter into a contract, upon award and approval of the Board of Control, with the lowest and best bidder for the 2010 Street Resurfacing Project in the City of Massillon, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN PETERS B Like the Clerk said its an ordinance authorizing the Director of Public Service and Safety to advertise and received sealed bids for the 2010 Street Resurfacing Project.  I asked Monday night if every member of council had a list of the streets if you don’t have let me know I’ll make you a copy before you leave tonight instead of taking the time to read them off here.  I don’t think we have to do that.

COUNCILMAN PETERS moved for suspension of the rules and passage, seconded by Councilman Mang.

 COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Any questions?  Mr. Manson?

COUNCILMAN MANSON B It really I have nothing at all opposed to this but why do they that broken down from 6th Street from Walnut to 6th Street, Walnut to Webb and Webb to Oberlin.  Why do they break down like that separately?

COUNCILMAN PETERS B I don’t know but I noticed the same thing.  We can ask Keith if you want.

COUNCILMAN MANSON B It’s no big deal it doesn’t matter.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Would you like to call the engineer Mr. Manson?

COUNCILMAN MANSON B No, I withdraw the question.

The rules were suspended by a roll call vote of 8 yes.

ORDINANCE NO. 62 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 8 YES.

ORDINANCE NO. 63 B 2010                     BY:   STREETS, HIGHWAYS, TRAFFIC & SAFETY

Authorizing the Director of Public Service and Safety of the City of Massillon, Ohio, to advertise for and receive sealed bids and enter into a contract, upon award and approval of the Board of Control, with the lowest and best bidder for the 2010 CDBG Target Neighborhood Street Resurfacing Project in the City of Massillon, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN PETERS B Again, to go out and receive advertise and receive sealed bids for the award of the 2010 CDBG Target Neighborhood Street Resurfacing Project.  Again, I have the list of streets if every member doesn’t have them I will make copies for them.  I’m also going to make a motion that we pass this on its first reading.

COUNCILMAN PETERS moved for suspension of the rules and passage, seconded by Councilman Mang.

The rules were suspended by a roll call vote of 8 yes.

ORDINANCE NO. 63 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 8 YES.

ORDINANCE NO. 64 B 2010                     BY:   FINANCE COMMITTEE

Making certain appropriations from the unappropriated balance of the Park & Recreation Fund, General Fund and the Economic Development Fund, for the year ending December 31, 2010, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN MANSON B Yes, we have three parts to this we’ll go through them here.  In section 1, we have $50,000 and $10,000 please prepare an ordinance to appropriate from the unappropriated balance of the parks and recreation fund 1234 to the following accounts for the parks share: $10,000 for parks income tax refunds, contracted services that’s the $50,000.  Section 2; please prepare an ordinance to appropriate from the unappropriated balance of the general fund 1100 to the following account: $20,000 for income tax refunds.  Section 3, is what we talked about earlier with the Margaritas Mexican Grill $2,000 grant.  Are there any questions?

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Mrs. Catazaro-Perry?

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B Mr. Manson, could you explain the $50,000 contracted services what exactly is that for. 

COUNCILMAN MANSON B No, I can’t. It’s as its stated contracted services.

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B Could we bring up Mrs. Ferrero, please?

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Mr. Manson, is it included on the legislation request?

COUNCILMAN MANSON B It just says for contracted services it does not give any clear statement of its for.

AUDITOR FERRERO – It’s just $50,000 that they need in that contracted service line.  We had used some of that money when we bought the concession.  So we needed to put some money back in there for them to have for their contracts.

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY  B Thank you.

AUDITOR FERRERO – Sure.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER  B Mr. Manson, your motion please?

COUNCILMAN MANSON moved for suspension of the rules and passage, seconded by Councilman Hersher.

The rules were suspended by a roll call vote of 8 yes.

ORDINANCE NO. 64 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 8 YES.

7.  UNFINISHED BUSINESS

8.  PETITIONS AND GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS

LETTER FROM OHIO DIVISION OF LIQUOR CONTROL REGARDING A TRANSFER OF LIQUOR LICENSE FROM BETH A MOSBERGER DBA STUDIO CITY BILLARDS 641 LINCOLN WAY W SUITE B MASSILLON OHIO 44647 TO ELKS ONE INC DBA FIREHOUSE GRILLE & PUB 48 2ND ST MASSILLON OHIO 44646

9.  BILLS, ACCOUNTS AND CLAIMS

1.  Repository - $338.41

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER B Mr. Manson, we need a motion…

COUNCILMAN MANSON B I move that we pay the bill, seconded by Councilwoman Catazaro-Perry.

Roll call vote of 8 yes to pay the bills.

10.  REPORTS FROM CITY OFFICIALS

A). MAYOR SUBMITS MONTHLY PERMIT REPORT FOR APRIL 2010. B COPY FILE
B). AUDITOR SUBMITS MONTHLY REPORT FOR APRIL 2010 B COPY FILE

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER B Thank you, we will need a motion Mr. Manson to accept the auditor’s report.

COUNCILMAN MANSON B I move that we accept the auditor’s report, seconded by Councilman Hersher.

Roll call vote of 8 yes to accept the auditor’s report.

11.  REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER B We will have committee sessions next Monday the 10th at 5:30pm.  

12.  RESOLUTIONS AND REQUESTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER B Mrs. Catazaro-Perry?

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY B Mr. Mayor Held called me on Friday or Saturday and needs to reschedule.  He has to meet with another mayor from another city next Monday.  So we’re going to be postponing having Mayor Held at our committee meeting.  I do no have a date.

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER B Mr. Slagle?

COUNCILMAN SLAGLE B I request all council members that can make it to be present Saturday at 9:00am.  I’d also encourage any members of the public that want to go along this is not a closed meeting by any stretch of the imagination.  They should also attend we’re just looking at the parks.  The parks director will be there so if we have concerns and it should be expressed and that’s the day to do it.  We’re meeting at the rec. center and then from there we’re going to go to each individual park at 9:00am.

13.  CALL OF THE CALENDAR

14.  THIRD READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

ORDINANCE NO. 43B 2010                      BY:   COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Approving an application for assistance under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including the Consolidated Plan and Annual Plan; authorizing the execution and filing of the application and related assurances and certifications, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN MANG B We had the public hearing at the last council meeting which gives us an opportunity to find if we have people who are objecting to what we’re planning to distribute to organizations that we felt are needed and well deserved.  We also had a number of those organizations were here last Monday and explain what they were using the money for.  We also made an additional this year that I think was asked by Mr. Townsend of the Fourth Ward that we look at sidewalk repair.  That type of information was also included in this report. 

COUNCILMAN MANG moved to bring Ordinance No. 43 – 2010 forward for passage, seconded by Councilman McCune.

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY B As usual I am going to oppose this, this evening its due to the amount of dollars that we give to the Hampton Inn.  I find that $211,000 could be spent well within the city and many other capacities.  I do support all the other local agency projects.  However since we can’t split the vote on this I will be voting no on this but I do support everything but that piece of it. 

ORDINANCE NO. 43 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 7 YES, 1 NO. CATAZARO-PERRY VOTED NO.

  •  SECOND READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 

ORDINANCE NO. 55 B 2010                     BY:   ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE

Authorizing the Director of Public Service and Safety of the City of Massillon, Ohio, to advertise for and receive sealed bids and enter into a contract, upon award and approval of the Board of Control, with the lowest and best bidder, for the purchase of one waste packer truck for the City of Massillon Solid Waste Department, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN HERSHER B As we talked about at the work session Monday.  This is to replace a waste packer truck from 1998.  It will be equipped similarly to the last trucks that we purchased its anticipated it will cost around $125,000.  It comes from funds within the solid waste department.  As I understand from talking to our Director of Public Service and Safety its about a year from date to delivery.  So I would like to pass this, this evening I gave it two readings just to make sure that there wasn’t that no one had a problem with it.  I would like to go ahead and pass it tonight.

COUNCILMAN HERHSER moved for suspension of the rules and passage, seconded by Councilman Manson.

The rules were suspended by a roll call vote of 8 yes.

ORDINANCE NO. 55 – 2010 WAS PASSED BY A ROLL CALL VOTE OF 8 YES.

ORDINANCE NO. 56 B 2010                     BY:   STREETS, HIGHWAYS, TRAFFIC AND SAFETY

Authorizing the Director of Public Service and Safety of the City of Massillon, Ohio, to rename Isabella Avenue SW running east/west between Duncan Street SW and Jackson Street SW to Mark Ross Avenue SW, and declaring an emergency.

 

COUNCILMAN PETERS B A public hearing was held tonight at 7:05pm in regards to this ordinance.  Nobody spoke in opposition of it but I decided to two reasons I’m head of the streets and highways and its also in my ward.  We’re going to send out letters to all the residents on Isabella to make sure that they know about what we’re doing.  We’re going to hold another public hearing before the third reading which will be May 17th and Mary Beth say 7:20?  (Yes)  At 7:20pm here in council chambers.  So second reading.

ORDINANCE NO. 56 – 2010 WAS GIVEN SECOND READING.  

16.  NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER B Mrs. Catazaro-Perry?

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY B I just have a question.  The end of the month the 31st is a holiday and we generally take off the fourth Monday.  So would we be going forward with working on the 24th and taking the 31st off?

COUNCIL PRESIDENT GAMBER B I’m assuming we would be here June the 1st. 

COUNCILWOMAN CATAZARO-PERRY B Be here June the 1st and not the 24th.  Thank you.

  • REMARKS OF DELEGATIONS AND CITIZENS TO MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA

 

18.  ADJOURNMENT

COUNCILMAN MANG I move that we adjourn, seconded by all.


_________________________
MARY BETH BAILEY, CLERK,

______________________________
GLENN E. GAMBER, PRESIDENT

 

©Copyright 1998 - present City of Massillon. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Maintained by Imaging 2000 Web Design